�Given that the Planck mass is nothing like a minimum possible mass, why do some people assume that the Planck length/time are the minimum possible length and time? If we have no problem with there being masses that are (much) smaller than the Planck mass, why do we assume that the Planck length and time are the fundamental units of quantisation? Why could there not be smaller distances and
Home
Dear Dr B
Physics
Quantum Gravity
Dear Dr. Bee: Why do some people assume that the Planck length/time are the minimum possible length and time?
Monday, 10 August 2015
Dear Dr. Bee: Why do some people assume that the Planck length/time are the minimum possible length and time?
- A macaroni pie? Elephants blowing ballons? No, it�s Verlinde�s entangled universe.In a re
- Once upon a time, at the far end of the universe, two galaxy clusters collided. Their hea
- 2015 was the International Year of Light. In May, I came across this video by the Max Pla
- Since I had the blue screen up already, I wanted to try out some things to improve my vid
- A lightsaber works by emitting a stream of magnetic monopoles. Magnetic monopoles are hea
- If you fall into a black hole, you�ll die. That much is pretty sure. But what happens bef
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
EmoticonEmoticon